Corrections Policy
Last Updated: July 5, 2026
At CricLogic, we aim to publish accurate, clear, and useful cricket information. We recognize that errors can occur and that cricket rules, playing conditions, statistics, schedules, and other information may change over time.
This Corrections Policy explains how CricLogic reviews and handles reported errors, clarifications, updates, and corrections.
1. Our Commitment to Accuracy
CricLogic aims to correct material factual errors when they are identified and reasonably verified.
Our content may cover:
– Cricket rules and concepts
– Playing conditions
– Match analysis
– Pitch behaviour
– Tactical analysis
– Statistics
– Tournament formats
– DLS-related explanations
– Cricket tools and calculators
– Educational cricket content
Because these areas may involve changing information, interpretation, or technical implementation, we aim to review credible correction requests carefully.
2. What We Consider a Correction
A correction may be appropriate when published content contains a material factual error.
Examples may include:
– Incorrect cricket rules
– Incorrect playing conditions
– Wrong scores or match details
– Incorrect dates
– Incorrect player or team information
– Incorrect tournament information
– Misstated statistics
– Incorrect calculations
– Materially inaccurate descriptions
– Incorrect attribution
– Broken or misleading references
The significance of an error depends on its effect on the meaning and reliability of the content.
3. Minor Changes
Minor changes may be made without a formal correction notice.
These may include:
– Spelling corrections
– Grammar improvements
– Punctuation changes
– Formatting fixes
– Minor wording improvements
– Broken-link replacements
– Readability improvements
– Non-material typographical corrections
Such changes do not normally alter the substantive meaning of an article.
4. Material Corrections
When a significant factual error is verified, CricLogic may:
– Correct the inaccurate statement
– Replace incorrect information
– Add missing context
– Clarify ambiguous wording
– Update the relevant section
– Add a correction note where appropriate
The method used depends on the nature and seriousness of the issue.
5. Clarifications
Sometimes published information may be technically correct but unclear, incomplete, or open to reasonable misunderstanding.
In such cases, CricLogic may add a clarification rather than issue a factual correction.
A clarification may:
– Explain the intended meaning
– Add relevant context
– Distinguish between different cricket formats
– Identify tournament-specific rules
– Separate fact from interpretation
– Explain limitations in available data
6. Updates Are Not Always Corrections
Cricket information changes frequently.
An article may be updated because of:
– New playing conditions
– Rule changes
– Tournament changes
– Schedule changes
– New match data
– Updated team information
– New official announcements
– Improved statistical information
An update does not necessarily mean that the original article was incorrect when published.
7. Cricket Rules and Playing Conditions
Cricket regulations may vary according to:
– Match format
– Competition
– Tournament
– Governing body
– Season
– Match category
If an article incorrectly presents a competition-specific playing condition as a universal rule, we may correct or clarify the content.
Where possible, readers should consult the applicable official playing conditions for authoritative decisions.
8. Statistical Corrections
If a statistical error is reported, we may review:
– The original data source
– Match format
– Date range
– Sample size
– Venue filters
– Opposition filters
– Calculation method
– Data updates
Different statistical databases may occasionally produce different results because of methodology, classification, or update timing.
Where relevant, we may clarify the source or methodology rather than treating every discrepancy as an error.
9. Match Analysis and Opinion
Not every disagreement with analysis constitutes a factual error.
CricLogic may publish interpretations concerning:
– Pitch conditions
– Tactical decisions
– Team balance
– Player roles
– Bowling matchups
– Batting depth
– Match situations
– Statistical patterns
Reasonable readers may disagree with analytical conclusions.
We generally distinguish between:
– Factual errors
– Analytical interpretation
– Opinion
– Forecasts
– Estimates
A prediction that does not occur is not automatically a factual correction issue.
10. DLS Content and Calculator Corrections
DLS-related content requires particular care because official systems and independent tools may differ.
Unless explicitly and verifiably stated otherwise, a CricLogic DLS calculator is an independent tool and is not the official ICC Professional Edition DLS software.
If a calculator issue is reported, we may review:
– Input validation
– Overs and balls conversion
– Wickets entered
– Resource assumptions
– Mathematical formulas
– Rounding rules
– Target calculation
– Browser behaviour
– JavaScript implementation
If a verified technical defect is identified, we may correct the calculator.
Differences between an independent calculator and an official match result do not automatically prove a software defect because methodologies and authorized systems may differ.
11. How to Report an Error
To report a possible error, email:
shivasudheer771@gmail.com
Please include, where possible:
– Article or page title
– Page URL
– The specific statement or result in question
– Why you believe it is incorrect
– The proposed correction
– A reliable supporting source
– Screenshot, if relevant
Detailed reports are easier to review.
12. Review Process
When a credible correction request is received, CricLogic may:
1. Review the disputed content
2. Examine the available evidence
3. Check relevant sources
4. Compare official or authoritative information where available
5. Determine whether a correction, clarification, update, or no change is appropriate
Not every request will result in a change.
13. Source Priority
When reviewing factual disputes, we may prioritize sources such as:
– Official laws and playing conditions
– Official governing-body publications
– Primary sources
– Official tournament information
– Official team communications
– Reliable statistical databases
– Reputable news organizations
The most appropriate source depends on the claim being reviewed.
14. Correction Notes
For significant corrections, CricLogic may add a note explaining:
– What was incorrect
– What was changed
– When the correction was made
Minor edits may be made without a public correction note.
15. Removal of Content
In limited circumstances, content may be removed when:
– It contains serious inaccuracies
– It creates legal concerns
– It infringes rights
– It cannot be responsibly corrected
– It presents security or privacy risks
– Removal is otherwise necessary
Removal decisions are made according to the circumstances.
16. Reader Feedback
Constructive reader feedback can help improve CricLogic.
We welcome credible reports concerning:
– Factual inaccuracies
– Outdated information
– Broken links
– Calculator defects
– Misleading wording
– Incorrect statistics
– Missing context
Abusive, fraudulent, spam, or irrelevant messages may not receive a response.
17. Contact Us
For corrections, clarifications, or factual concerns, contact:
Website: CricLogic
Email: shivasudheer771@gmail.com
Please provide enough detail for the issue to be reviewed efficiently.
—
CricLogic — Cricket Explained Through Logic